10080 - | | |   10134 - Reply from youcef (algeria) - 2009-02-06
| in 1948 there was a conflict because the palestinians refused the unfair UN plan for their land and the jews won it thanks to european weapons and backing and took even bigger portions of land than the unfair UN resolution gave them , in the conquered land they practiced ethnic cleansing and deported the arab inhabitants to the tiny territories of the west bank and Gaza to settle the jews in their place , don't tell me you approve of this and don't tell me it is not theft, and about that UN resolution it was obviously unfair , it gave 56% of the territory to the jews who were then 33% of the population and 44% of the territory to the arabs who were 67% of the population , this division is quite unfair , moreover it gave arab lands that had no jews at all to the future jewish state , it is clear that this resolution of 1947 was made by pro jewish-state countries ( countries that control the UN ) and in a context of sympathy toward the jews after the holocaust , but why should the palestinians pay for the crimes of Nazis ? it makes no sense .
the 1967 war was actually started by the israelis and presented as a self defense war (just like they did recently with Gaza and Lebanon) and they used some silly excuse for it, they started it in the purpose of conquering even more territories while perfectly knowing they would win because they had already fully prepared for it and had all the necessary weapons and foreign support (in fact it was in the 60s that the americans created the israeli atomic bomb)and they even corrupted the egyptian generals in advance , so they would not oppose much resistance.
finally yes , the first jewish immigrants in palestine in the beginning of the twentieth century were rich , much richer than the palestinans and they bought large parcels of land from them to settle there , they were rather in small numbers , it was only after WW2 that the jewish emigration to palestine suddenly skyrocketed , these new immigrants were very numerous and traumatised by WW2 and they had no time to negotiate and buy some small parcels of land so they simply took the land by force and deported its inhabitants away and established their state there , it is for this reason that i consider that state of israel to be illegitimate . because it was established on stolen lands and after ethnic cleansing of their original inhabitants, such a state has no legitimacy for me , even if the UN acknowledges it as legitimate , we all know that UN is nothing but an organisation where five countries (countries that won WW2)(USA, Russia, France, UK, China) impose their world-order upon the rest of humanity , it orders the overthrow of whatever regime these countries do not like and supports whatever country that these countries like , only a fool could see the UN as God and consider whatever it issues as fair and legal .
Now , enough of history , past is past , my opinion for a solution is still the same : one single |
|
